<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d10249995\x26blogName\x3dStupid+Criminal+Files\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dSILVER\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttp://stupidcriminalfile.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://stupidcriminalfile.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-5690175230887541298', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
Stupid Case File for August 14, 2006

Mr. Ignacio E-Mails Again ...

Read the previous posts if you'd like to get the history. For the faithful, regular readers, there's no need to look up the old stuff.

Here is the first of two e-mails...

-----Original Message-----
From: Tevis Ignacio [mailto:noreply-comment@blogger.com]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 4:25 PM
To: kicknit4u02@msn.com
Subject: [Stupid Criminal File] 8/11/2006 04:24:30 PM

Go to "tevisi.blog.com"
Thanks for the advice.

And the second e-mail ...

-----Original Message-----
From: tevis@myway.com [mailto:tevis@myway.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 12:58 PM
To: jon@flashreport.org
Cc: kicknit4u02@msn.com
Subject: 9th Circuit Judges



To whom it may concern,
I guess, I'll I can do about this is joke about this. Lucky for me nobody reads your articles.

Remember when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit wanted to tell our children to take God out of the pledge of allegiance.
The news that flashed around the world in 202....

9TH CIRCUIT COURT: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Then again in 203 ...

9TH CIRCUIT'S REFUSAL TO REVIEW IT'S BAN OF THE
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

In this case the 9th says it has the SUPREME RIGHT TO RULE. (Even when it is being accused of a cover-up) Who is going to hold these judges accountable for their judgments?

Nevada man failed to establish subject matter jurisdiction. Representing himself, Ignacio alleged that the circuit judges—along with various federal and California state judges, other government officials, and certain private individuals—conspired to dismiss the state and federal lawsuits he filed in the wake of his California divorce proceedings.

(If the Federal Court does not have jurisdiction than who does?)

I can just see these judges when they die and go up and knock on heaven gate, God is going to say "Who is there and what did you do?" They will say "It is I or us and I or we were Judges of the 9th Circuit"

God will say to them! "You failed to establish subject matter jurisdiction" and "PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE! Go and see the other God in Hell, your know your buddy the attorney."

If I were God, I would tell the devil to have fun with these 9th Circuit Judges. But, you know Devil (the judge of the underworld), you still have to be accountable for your actions.

Editor's Note: I'm sorry that Mr. Ignacio believes "Lucky for me nobody reads your articles." We want our loyal readers to know that you do matter to us, and we do appreciate that you read our articles and posts. We love getting the e-mails, and reading the comments you leave on our site. We started this as a pet project, and your overwhelming response provides us with the encouragement and motivation to go on. Who makes up our contributors? 1 city cop, one county sheriff, two federal law enforcement personnel, and one journalist. Our gang of four have either gone to school together, gone to church together, or worked together. What has this crazy, wacky, and fun group of friends accomplished with the Stupid Ciminal File? Met a lot of new friends! How many do you ask? Well, for the first time, we will share some numbers:
  • 2,059,921 unique visitors since inception
  • 5,696,629 pageloads since inception
  • 300+ return visitors each month
  • 200+ links from other websites
Again, thank you loyal readers for counting on us for a good laugh or two.

2 Comments:

Blogger Tevis Ignacio said...

How can I take your word on the numbers? How many times did you or someone who is associated with you log on your cite? Since you believe in the Ninth Circuit Judge. My ex-wife is an accountant and she knew how to fix numbers too.
I seen a lot of propaganda, but when you stick by a bunch of judges who fix transcripts in divorce cases. And the Ninth Circuit covers for them. And you guys call me crazy and Stupid?
There can only be one truth. I put your name on my blog and title it "Stupid Blog File."

August 23, 2006 10:03 PM  
Blogger Zen Angel said...

Well, I am one of those return visitors and one who has posted a link to this site from my own blog. Viva Stupid Criminal File!

January 05, 2007 10:14 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home